Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF RAJAK v. CROATIA
CASE OF HICAP OZTEKIN v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2000 of 14 January 2000 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled medium grain and long grain A rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2178/1999
CASE OF CSANADI v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BECERIKLI AND ALTEKIN v. TURKEY
CASE OF TENCE v. SLOVENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF TERSHIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF PFEIFENBERGER v. AUSTRIA
PIERSACK CASE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1820/95 of 26 July 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2257/92 laying down detailed rules for implementation of the specific arrangements for supplying Madeira with certain vegetable oils and establishing a forecast balance, and amending Regulation (EC) No 2883/94 establishing a forecast balance for the supply to the Canary Islands of agricultural products covered by the specific measures provided for in Articles 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MUSHTA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 8863/06 • ECHR ID: 001-101769

Document date: November 18, 2010

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

Z unique documents cited • X citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846