Browsing history:

↳
Ó'FAOLAIN v. IRELAND
CASE OF AŞILI DOĞAN AND OTHERS AND 6 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 12/2014 of 8 January 2014 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Salinātā rudzu rupjmaize (TSG)]
CLINTON, SIMPSON, MAGUIRE, McGEOWN, MURRAY, CAMPBELL, SMYTH, BRESLIN, CONNOLLY, McGUINNESS, X., Y., Z. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Judgment of the Court of 12 December 1995. H. G. Oude Luttikhuis and others v Verenigde Coöperatieve Melkindustrie Coberco BA.
CASE OF M.K. AND OTHERS v. POLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE
CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
CASE OF RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MITS
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIAPARTLY CONCURRING, PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE
CASE OF S.C. SERVICE BENZ COM S.R.L. v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CSÜLLÖG v. HUNGARY

Doc ref: 30042/08 • ECHR ID: 001-104963

Document date: June 7, 2011

Inbound citations: 15
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 15

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

UY unique documents citing • PY citations total to i paragraphs

Outbound citations

L unique documents cited • X2 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846