Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PONOMARENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
CASE OF PARKHOMENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 June 2018. UAB „Enteco Baltic“ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1527/2006 of 12 October 2006 concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 18/2002 of 7 January 2002 suspending the preferential customs duties and re-establishing the Common Customs Tariff duty on imports of large-flowered roses originating in Israel
Commission Regulation (EC) No 402/2003 of 3 March 2003 suspending the preferential customs duties and re-establishing the Common Customs Tariff duty on imports of uniflorous (bloom) carnations originating in Israel
Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/94 of 16 March 1994 establishing for 1993 and 1994 the breakdown for beef imports from the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 715/90
Commission Regulation (EC) No 310/2006 of 22 February 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1695/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the French intervention agency
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1744/2005 of 24 October 2005 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1168/2005 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Austrian intervention agency
Commission Regulation (EU) No 48/2011 of 20 January 2011 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 March 2011 to 31 May 2011

Document text Analytics

CASE OF TRADE UNION OF THE POLICE IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

Doc ref: 11828/08 • ECHR ID: 001-113335

Document date: September 25, 2012

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 18

Separate Opinions

Browse separate opinions available for this document.

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER JOINED BY JUDGE GYULUMYAN

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846