Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SANCHEZ-REISSE v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
CASE OF SIDABRAS AND DŽIAUTAS v. LITHUANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THOMASSEN
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1219/95 of 30 May 1995 adopting transitional measures for the application of the tariff quota arrangements for imports of bananas for the third quarter of 1995 as a result of the Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden
CASE OF HALIP AND VELEA AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIAPARTLY CONCURRING, PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VUČINIĆ
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE POWER-FORDE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF PERUŠKO v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 36998/09 • ECHR ID: 001-115877

Document date: January 15, 2013

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 14

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

Zk unique documents cited • 3Q citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846