Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BARTA AND DRAJKÓ v. HUNGARY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 385/2001 of 26 February 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 in the raw tobacco sector as regards the moisture content allowed on delivery of certain varieties of tobacco and the recognised production areas
Macatė v. Lithuania [GC]
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK
CASE OF H.K. AGAINST FINLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 907/2001 of 8 May 2001 fixing the import duties in the rice sector
CASE OF YAĞCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 343/2011 of 8 April 2011 opening and providing for the administration of Union tariff quotas for wines originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Commission Directive 2000/23/EC of 27 April 2000 amending Directive 92/76/EEC recognising protected zones exposed to particular plant health risks in the Community
CASE OF ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIAPARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE COSTA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KARABET AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 38906/07;52025/07 • ECHR ID: 001-115886

Document date: January 17, 2013

Inbound citations: 19
•
Cited paragraphs: 10
•
Outbound citations: 39

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

8r unique documents citing • aD citations total to Vw paragraphs

Outbound citations

YR unique documents cited • Lg citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846