Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KULIKOWSKI v. POLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVI Ć
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1137/2011 of 9 November 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2011 for the 2011/12 marketing year
Commission Regulation (EC) No 78/2004 of 16 January 2004 fixing the maximum purchasing price for butter for the 86th invitation to tender carried out under the standing invitation to tender governed by Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999
BARSOM AND VARLI v. SWEDEN
KLOUTEN v. GERMANY
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RUSSO
CASE OF GOROU v. GREECE (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
CASE OF PFARRMEIER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 80/2012 of 31 January 2012 establishing the list of biological or chemical substances provided for in Article 53(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty
CASE OF ALINAK AND OTHERS AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MIHAILOVS v. LATVIA

Doc ref: 35939/10 • ECHR ID: 001-116075

Document date: January 22, 2013

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 23

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

a2 unique documents cited • 73 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846