Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 34/1999 of 8 January 1999 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled medium round grain and long grain a rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2565/98
CASE OF W v. FINLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EU) No 156/2010 of 24 February 2010 fixing an acceptance percentage for the issuing of export licences, rejecting export licence applications and suspending the lodging of export licence applications for out-of-quota sugar
CASE OF KONOVALOVA AGAINST RUSSIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 1777/2005 of 17 October 2005 laying down implementing measures for Directive 77/388/EEC on the common system of value added tax
CASE OF TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BORREGO BORREGO
CASE OF LEPOJIC v. SERBIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA
CASE OF H. v. BELGIUMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 379/2005 of 4 March 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1168/1999 laying down marketing standards for plums
CASE OF PELEVIN AGAINST UKRAINE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF R.M.S. v. SPAIN [Extracts]

Doc ref: 28775/12 • ECHR ID: 001-121906

Document date: June 18, 2013

Inbound citations: 13
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 21

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

qX unique documents citing • G6 citations total to m paragraphs

Outbound citations

Mg unique documents cited • Hd citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846