Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŽÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLICCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE
CASE OF BORCSOK BODOR v. HUNGARY
CASE OF SÜVEGES v. HUNGARYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3760/83 of 22 December 1983 laying down for 1984 certain measures for the conservation and management of fishery resources applicable to vessels registered in the Faroe Islands
CASE OF BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF RIENER v. BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Regulation (EEC) No 2592/73 of the Council of 24 September 1973 supplementing Regulation (EEC) No 816/70 as regards the total maximum content of sulphur dioxide (SO*) in wines other than sparkling wines and liqueur wines intended for direct human consumption in the Community
CASE OF BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR TORRES BOURSAULT, AD HOC JUDGE
CASE OF GENÇER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed

Document text Analytics

CASE OF VOLKOV AND ADAMSKIY v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 7614/09;30863/10 • ECHR ID: 001-152988

Document date: March 26, 2015

Inbound citations: 32
•
Cited paragraphs: 10
•
Outbound citations: 21

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

bY unique documents citing • v5 citations total to Fd paragraphs

Outbound citations

KZ unique documents cited • xv citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846