Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ZIMMERMANN AND STEINER
Council Decision (EU) 2017/733 of 25 April 2017 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Croatia
CASE OF ALEKSEY OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
CASE OF BUKHARATYAN v. ARMENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GYULUMYAN
CASE OF LAZORIVA v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3938/87 of 23 December 1987 fixing the monetary compensatory amounts applicable in the agricultural sector and certain coefficients and rates required for their application
CASE OF LUPĂCESCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF HANDOLSDALEN SAMI VILLAGE AND OTHERS v. SWEDENPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE
CASE OF PALOMO SÁNCHEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
A.B. v. the Netherlands

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ÄRZTEKAMMER FÜR WIEN AND DORNER v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 8895/10 • ECHR ID: 001-160623

Document date: February 16, 2016

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 17

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

8 unique documents citing • w citations total to B paragraphs

Outbound citations

S1 unique documents cited • 1Y citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846