Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 289/2002 of 15 February 2002 deciding not to accept tenders submitted in response to the 283rd partial invitation to tender as a general intervention measure pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 1627/89
CASE OF ANDRIY RUDENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF TÜTÜNCÜ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF POLIMERKONTEYNER, TOV AGAINST UKRAINE
CASE OF CRACIUN AGAINST ROMANIA AND 4 OTHER CASES
Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 95/2012 of 6 February 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 1125/2010 as regards the intervention centres for cereals in Germany
CASE OF PREDESCU v. ROMANIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 182/2005 of 2 February 2005 determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged in respect of the quota for live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2124/2004, can be accepted
CASE OF ILGAR MAMMADOV AGAINST AZERBAIJAN

Document text Analytics

CASE OF IVANOVA AND CHERKEZOV v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 46577/15 • ECHR ID: 001-162117

Document date: April 21, 2016

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 27

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

gd unique documents cited • CU citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846