Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MACINKOVIC AGAINST CROATIA AND 6 OTHER CASES
CASE OF NIKOLIĆ v. CROATIA
Commission Regulation (EU) No 80/2011 of 31 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF NADTOKA v. RUSSIA
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 34/95 of 11 January 1995 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal
CASE OF ANDERSENA AGAINST LATVIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 49/2012 of 19 January 2012 fixing the export refunds on pigmeat
OFFERHAUS and OFFERHAUS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 98/2004 of 21 January 2004 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARKADDITIONAL DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOUROU-VIKSTRÖM (ON PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE COMMON DISSENTING OPINION)

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FÜRST-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 33677/10;52340/10 • ECHR ID: 001-162864

Document date: May 17, 2016

Inbound citations: 22
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 38

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

sT unique documents citing • fE citations total to L paragraphs

Outbound citations

Eb unique documents cited • CG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846