Browsing history:

↳
A.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
DIVAGSA COMPANY v. ESPAGNE
CASE OF MAMIC v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF ULLRICH v. AUSTRIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 993/2004 of 17 May 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 658/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia and Regulation (EC) No 132/2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Poland and Ukraine, and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of imports originating in Lithuania
CASE OF MOHAI v. HUNGARY
B. and Others v. the NETHERLANDS
CASE OF LSI INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES v. GREECE
CASE OF E.B. v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 July 2010. European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BAYDAR v. THE NETHERLANDS

Doc ref: 55385/14 • ECHR ID: 001-182454

Document date: April 24, 2018

Inbound citations: 20
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 15

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

0G unique documents citing • 0I citations total to 2 paragraphs

Outbound citations

Z7 unique documents cited • Sl citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846