Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF OSMANOĞLU AND KOCABAŞ v. SWITZERLAND
A.G. AND M.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 417/2008 of 8 May 2008 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
CASE OF RAMADAN v. MALTA
2011/346/EU: Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 on the State aid C 33/09 (ex NN 57/09, CP 191/09) implemented by Portugal in the form of a State guarantee to BPP (notified under document C(2010) 4932) Text with EEA relevance
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 December 2004. Viktor Hlozek v Roche Austria Gesellschaft mbH.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2156/2005 of 23 December 2005 amending the specification of a protected designation of origin listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 ( Siurana ) (PDO)
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 92/85 of 14 January 1985 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
KOSTJUCENKOVS v. LATVIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF VINKS AND RIBICKA v. LATVIA

Doc ref: 28926/10 • ECHR ID: 001-200436

Document date: January 30, 2020

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 12

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

3 unique documents citing • T citations total to y paragraphs

Outbound citations

U2 unique documents cited • nq citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846