Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOMP ARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 573/83 of 14 March 1983 on communications from Member States to the Commission with regard to peas and field beans
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 36/87 of 7 January 1987 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Regulation (EEC) No 1710/74 of the Commission of 2 July 1974 amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 1162/74 concerning the sale of beef and veal held by intervention agencies at prices fixed in advance at a standard rate
Regulation (EEC) No 2773/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 laying down rules for calculating the levy and the sluice-gate price for eggs
CASE OF KULYKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 417/93 of 25 February 1993 correcting Regulation (EEC) No 859/89 laying down detailed rules for the application of intervention measures in the beef and veal sector
CASE OF KARAMAN AGAINST TURKEY
RUTKOWSKI v. POLAND

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CÎNȚA v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 3891/19 • ECHR ID: 001-201533

Document date: February 18, 2020

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 9
•
Outbound citations: 35

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

cI unique documents citing • wX citations total to x paragraphs

Outbound citations

Iq unique documents cited • T0 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846