Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF HÅKANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
CASE OF ANTWI AND OTHERS v. NORWAYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SICILIANOS, JOINED BY JUDGE LAZAROVA TRAJKOVSKA
CASE OF GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VEHABOVIĆ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 416/87 of 11 February 1987 amending for the sixth time Regulation (EEC) No 3800/81 determining the classification of vine varieties
Bagirov v. Azerbaijan
CASE OF POCIUS v. LITHUANIA
83/616/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 November 1983 amending Decision 83/218/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Romania approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community
CASE OF SPORRONG AND LÖNNROTH v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON WITH REGARD TO ARTICLE 6 § 1 (art. 6-1) OF THE CONVENTION
CASE OF KUR v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 35880/14;75926/17 • ECHR ID: 001-205060

Document date: October 13, 2020

Inbound citations: 13
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 35

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

B5 unique documents citing • Ka citations total to D paragraphs

Outbound citations

ly unique documents cited • 1C citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846