Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VAN MARLE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDSDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CREMONA
CASE OF CAÑETE DE GOÑI v. SPAINDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL JOINED BY JUDGE STRÁŽNICKÁ
ABBASOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF NEŠIĆ v. MONTENEGRO
Council Directive 77/390/EEC of 17 May 1977 amending Directive 72/159/EEC on the modernization of farms
CASE OF KIRILCHUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 113/2001 of 19 January 2001 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2281/2000
CASE OF BRODA AND BOJARA v. POLAND
Commission Regulation (EU) No 26/2011 of 14 January 2011 concerning the authorisation of vitamin E as a feed additive for all animal species Text with EEA relevance
PAHOR AGAINST ITALY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KÖKSOY v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 31885/10 • ECHR ID: 001-205047

Document date: October 13, 2020

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 12

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

J unique documents citing • d citations total to x paragraphs

Outbound citations

XT unique documents cited • PW citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707