Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF POSEVINI v. BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES GROZEV AND RANZONI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 523/2004 of 19 March 2004 determining the world market price for unginned cotton
CASE OF KIRÁLY AND DÖMÖTÖR v. HUNGARYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2014 of 3 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. CROATIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KOSKELO AND EICKE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 10/2003 of 3 January 2003 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
CASE OF AKSU v. TURKEYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TULKENS, TSOTSORIA AND PARDALOS
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER, JOINED BY JUDGES BERNHARDT AND LEVITS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 96/2012 of 6 February 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF İZZETTİN DOĞAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SILVIS

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 March 2017. X and X v État belge.

C-638/16 PPU • 62016CJ0638 • ECLI:EU:C:2017:173

Inbound citations: 42
•
Cited paragraphs: 10
•
Outbound citations: 27

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

TH unique documents citing • NK citations total to 6p paragraphs

Outbound citations

TN unique documents cited • WZ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846