Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 11501/85 • ECHR ID: 001-571

Document date: July 16, 1986

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 11501/85 • ECHR ID: 001-571

Document date: July 16, 1986

Cited paragraphs only



The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on

16 July 1986, the following members being present:

                    MM. C.A. NØRGAARD, President

                        J.A. FROWEIN

                        F. ERMACORA

                        E. BUSUTTIL

                        G. JÖRUNDSSON

                        G. TENEKIDES

                        S. TRECHSEL

                        B. KIERNAN

                        A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                        A. WEITZEL

                        J.C. SOYER

                        H.G. SCHERMERS

                        H. DANELIUS

                        G. BATLINER

                        H. VANDENBERGHE

                   Mrs  G.H. THUNE

                   Sir  Basil HALL

                   Mr.  H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission

Having regard to Art. 25 (art. 25) of the Convention for the

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

Having regard to the application introduced on 21 December 1984 by

P.B. against the United Kingdom and registered on 20 April 1985

under file No. 11501/85;

Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 40 of the Rules of

Procedure of the Commission;

Having deliberated;

Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant is a British citizen born on 4 January 1960 and is

currently serving a prison sentence at H.M. Prison Featherstone

Wolverhampton.  The facts, as submitted by the applicant, may be

summarised as follows.

On 5 September 1984 a camera crew from Central Television visited

Leicester Prison, where the applicant was then held, to collect

material for a television programme.  The applicant was filmed without

his knowledge or consent.  The documentary programme was screened on

public television on 10 September 1984 and the applicant discovered

that he had been filmed walking across a yard, his face fully

revealed.

The applicant complained to the prison governor, who told him that the

film crew had been briefed to ask permission of all inmates who were

filmed.  The applicant was at no time asked for his permission.

The applicant also petitioned the Secretary of State but on

13 September 1984 his petition was refused.

The applicant subsequently sought legal advice with a view to

initiating court proceedings for breach of privacy against the

television company and the prison authorities.  He was informed in

counsel's opinion dated 11 December 1984 that there was no ground in

English law for bringing proceedings against either party.

COMPLAINTS

The applicant complains that the film constituted a breach of his

privacy, causing embarrassment, humiliation and shame to himself and

his family and friends.  He has lost contact with his family since the

film as a result and states that his prospects of employment after

release have been harmed.  He further complains there is no effective

remedy for his complaints.

The applicant accordingly invokes Arts. 8 and 13 (art. 8, art. 13) of

the Convention.

Proceedings before the Commission

The application was introduced on 21 December 1984 and registered on

20 April 1985.  The Secretariat requested further information in a

letter dated 14 August 1985.  A further letter dated 11 March 1986 was

sent to the applicant's prison and home addresses repeating the

request for information and warning that if no reply was received the

Commission might strike the application off its list of cases.  The

letter addressed to the applicant's home address was returned for the

reason that the applicant had "gone away".  No reply was made to the

letter sent to the prison where the applicant had previously been

serving his sentence.

Finding of the Commission

The Commission notes that the applicant has failed to respond to a

request for further information sent on 14 August 1985 and

11 March 1985 respectively.  It would further appear that if he is no

longer at the prison or home address previously given, he has failed

to inform the Commission of any change in address.  The Commission

therefore finds that the applicant has lost interest in maintaining

his application before the Commission and that there are no reasons

relating to the general interest to continue its examination of the

application.

For these reasons, the Commission

DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.

Secretary to the Commission               President of the Commission

       (H.C. KRÜGER)                            (C.A. NØRGAARD)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255