Browsing history:

↳
N. AND M. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SIKO v. HUNGARY
CASE OF DIRNBERGER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF CHEPELEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF NIKËHASANI v. ALBANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2594/93 of 22 September 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2293/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 with regard to the set-aside scheme referred to in Article 7
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat
CASE OF S. v. ESTONIA
CASE OF ÁDÁM AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KJØLBRO, RANZONI AND SCHUKKING
CASE OF AYHAN v. TURKEY (NO. 1)

Document text Analytics

KHANAM v. the UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 14112/88 • ECHR ID: 001-1309

Document date: December 14, 1988

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

b unique documents citing • n citations total to y paragraphs

Outbound citations

u unique documents cited • 5 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846