Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 15200/89 • ECHR ID: 001-752

Document date: October 5, 1990

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 15200/89 • ECHR ID: 001-752

Document date: October 5, 1990

Cited paragraphs only



Application No. 15200/89

by M.

against the United Kingdom

        The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on

5 October 1990, the following members being present:

                MM.  C.A. NØRGAARD, President

                     S. TRECHSEL

                     F. ERMACORA

                     G. SPERDUTI

                     E. BUSUTTIL

                     G. JÖRUNDSSON

                     A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                     A. WEITZEL

                     J.C. SOYER

                     H.G. SCHERMERS

                     H. DANELIUS

                Mrs.  G.H. THUNE

                Sir  Basil HALL

                MM.  F. MARTINEZ

                     C.L. ROZAKIS

                Mrs.  J. LIDDY

                MM.  L. LOUCAIDES

                     A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO

                     M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

                Mr.  H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission

        Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

        Having regard to the application introduced on 9 June 1990

by M. against the United Kingdom and registered on 10 July

1989 under file No. 15200/89;

        Having regard to:

     -  the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure

        of the Commission;

     -  the Commission's decision of 4 April 1990 to bring the

        application to the notice of the respondent Government

        and invite them to submit written observations on its

        admissibility and merits;

     -  the information provided by the Government on 26 July 1990;

     -  the response of the applicant on 9 August 1990.

        Having deliberated;

        Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

        The applicant is a British citizen born in B. in 1964.  She

settled in the United Kingdom in 1978 and resides in London.  She is

represented before the Commission by Messrs. Hafiz & Co., Solicitors,

London.

        The applicant complained of a refusal by British immigration

authorities to grant entry clearance to her Bangladeshi husband to

enable him to settle in the United Kingdom with her and their two

children.  The reason for this refusal is that when they married nine

years ago the husband was unable to satisfy the immigration

authorities that at that time his primary purpose in marrying was not

to obtain admission to the United Kingdom, in view of his previous

unsuccessful attempts to obtain visas for study and visitors leave to

that country.  The applicant claimed to be a victim of a violation of

Articles 5, 8, 12 and 13 of the Convention.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

        The application was introduced on 9 June 1989 and registered

on 10 July 1989.  After a preliminary examination of the case by the

Rapporteur, the Commission considered the admissibility of the

application on 4 April 1990.  It decided that, in accordance with Rule

42 para. 2 (b) of the Rules of Procedure, notice of the application

should be given to the Government of the United Kingdom and that the

parties should be invited to submit written observations on the

admissibility and merits of the case.

        However, on 26 July 1990 the Government informed the

Commission that they were prepared as an exceptional measure in the

circumstances of the present case to issue entry clearance to the

applicant's husband.  The applicant's representatives accepted this

offer and informed the Commission on 9 August 1990 that the applicant

wishes to withdraw her application to the Commission.

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

        The Commission notes that the applicant's husband is to be

allowed to settle in the United Kingdom and that the applicant wishes

to withdraw her application to the Commission.  It concludes,

therefore, that the applicant does not intend to pursue further her

petition, the factual basis of which has been resolved, within the

meaning of Article 30 para. 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention.

Moreover, the Commission finds no reasons of a general character

affecting respect for Human Rights, as defined in the Convention,

which require the further examination of the case by virtue of Article

30 para. 1 in fine of the Convention.

        For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,

        DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.

  Secretary to the Commission         President of the Commission

         (H.C. KRÜGER)                      (C.A. NØRGAARD)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846