M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Doc ref: 15200/89 • ECHR ID: 001-752
Document date: October 5, 1990
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Application No. 15200/89
by M.
against the United Kingdom
The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on
5 October 1990, the following members being present:
MM. C.A. NØRGAARD, President
S. TRECHSEL
F. ERMACORA
G. SPERDUTI
E. BUSUTTIL
G. JÖRUNDSSON
A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK
A. WEITZEL
J.C. SOYER
H.G. SCHERMERS
H. DANELIUS
Mrs. G.H. THUNE
Sir Basil HALL
MM. F. MARTINEZ
C.L. ROZAKIS
Mrs. J. LIDDY
MM. L. LOUCAIDES
A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO
M.P. PELLONPÄÄ
Mr. H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission
Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Having regard to the application introduced on 9 June 1990
by M. against the United Kingdom and registered on 10 July
1989 under file No. 15200/89;
Having regard to:
- the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
of the Commission;
- the Commission's decision of 4 April 1990 to bring the
application to the notice of the respondent Government
and invite them to submit written observations on its
admissibility and merits;
- the information provided by the Government on 26 July 1990;
- the response of the applicant on 9 August 1990.
Having deliberated;
Decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant is a British citizen born in B. in 1964. She
settled in the United Kingdom in 1978 and resides in London. She is
represented before the Commission by Messrs. Hafiz & Co., Solicitors,
London.
The applicant complained of a refusal by British immigration
authorities to grant entry clearance to her Bangladeshi husband to
enable him to settle in the United Kingdom with her and their two
children. The reason for this refusal is that when they married nine
years ago the husband was unable to satisfy the immigration
authorities that at that time his primary purpose in marrying was not
to obtain admission to the United Kingdom, in view of his previous
unsuccessful attempts to obtain visas for study and visitors leave to
that country. The applicant claimed to be a victim of a violation of
Articles 5, 8, 12 and 13 of the Convention.
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION
The application was introduced on 9 June 1989 and registered
on 10 July 1989. After a preliminary examination of the case by the
Rapporteur, the Commission considered the admissibility of the
application on 4 April 1990. It decided that, in accordance with Rule
42 para. 2 (b) of the Rules of Procedure, notice of the application
should be given to the Government of the United Kingdom and that the
parties should be invited to submit written observations on the
admissibility and merits of the case.
However, on 26 July 1990 the Government informed the
Commission that they were prepared as an exceptional measure in the
circumstances of the present case to issue entry clearance to the
applicant's husband. The applicant's representatives accepted this
offer and informed the Commission on 9 August 1990 that the applicant
wishes to withdraw her application to the Commission.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
The Commission notes that the applicant's husband is to be
allowed to settle in the United Kingdom and that the applicant wishes
to withdraw her application to the Commission. It concludes,
therefore, that the applicant does not intend to pursue further her
petition, the factual basis of which has been resolved, within the
meaning of Article 30 para. 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention.
Moreover, the Commission finds no reasons of a general character
affecting respect for Human Rights, as defined in the Convention,
which require the further examination of the case by virtue of Article
30 para. 1 in fine of the Convention.
For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,
DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.
Secretary to the Commission President of the Commission
(H.C. KRÜGER) (C.A. NØRGAARD)
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
