Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 of 29 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards sugar production in excess of the quota
CASE OF FLERI SOLER AND CAMILLERI v. MALTA
CASE OF VELOSA BARRETO v. PORTUGALDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GOTCHEV
Council Regulation (EC) No 3095/95 of 22 December 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and Regulation (EEC) No 1945/93 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92
CASE OF ERDOĞAN YAĞIZ v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CABRAL BARRETO

Document text Analytics

AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE

Doc ref: 14807/89 • ECHR ID: 001-1201

Document date: February 12, 1992

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

c unique documents cited • l citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846