Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

J.K. v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 15961/90 • ECHR ID: 001-1492

Document date: February 8, 1993

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

J.K. v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 15961/90 • ECHR ID: 001-1492

Document date: February 8, 1993

Cited paragraphs only



                      Application No. 15961/90

                      by J.K.

                      against Austria

      The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on

8 February 1993, the following members being present:

           MM.   C.A. NØRGAARD, President

                 J.A. FROWEIN

                 S. TRECHSEL

                 F. ERMACORA

                 A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                 A. WEITZEL

                 J.-C. SOYER

                 H.G. SCHERMERS

                 H. DANELIUS

           Sir   Basil HALL

           Mr.   F. MARTINEZ

           Mrs.  J. LIDDY

           MM.   J.-C. GEUS

                 M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

                 B. MARXER

                 G.B. REFFI

                 Mr. H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission

      Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

      Having regard to the application introduced on 23 October 1989

by J.K. against Austria and registered on 10 January 1990 under file

No. 15961/90;

      Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission;

      Having deliberated;

      Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

      The applicant is an Austrian citizen born in 1947.  He lives in

Klagenfurt.  He is represented before the Commission by Mr. K. Katary,

a lawyer practising in Vienna.

      The facts of the case may be summarised as follows:

      The applicant is the editor of a periodical entitled "Weitblick"

(Long view).  On 2 February 1988 the periodical printed four verses of

the national socialist song "Es zittern die morschen Knochen" ("The

rotten bones quake").  Proceedings under Section 3 of the National

Socialism (Prohibition) Act 1945 ("the Prohibition Act") were formally

discontinued by the prosecuting authority (Staatsanwaltschaft) on 19

March 1988, pursuant to Article 90 para. 1 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure (Strafprozeßordnung).

      The Klagenfurt Federal Police (Bundespolizeidirektion) brought

administrative criminal proceedings against the applicant, which led

to his conviction on 23 September 1988 by the Carinthian Security

Directorate (Sicherheitsdirektion) for having disseminated national

socialist philosophy within the meaning of the Prohibition Act because

he failed to prevent the publication of the national socialist song "Es

zittern die morschen Knochen".  He was fined AS 1,000 under Section 9

(1) (7) of the Introductory Provisions to the Code of Administrative

Procedure (Einführungsgesetz zu den Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetzen) with

provision for two days' imprisonment in default.  Section 9(1)(7) was

added to the Introductory Provisions in 1986.

      The applicant made a complaint under Article 144 of the Federal

Constitution, alleging a violation of Article 90 para. 2 of the Federal

Constitution (as the offence in the Prohibition Act is defined as

political and therefore to be tried by a jury), a violation of the

principle of Austrian law that the Prohibition Act regulated

exhaustively questions of national socialism, and a violation of

Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.  The applicant also requested the

Constitutional Court to refer his complaints to the Administrative

Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof), should it not be accepted by the

Constitutional Court.

      On 7 March 1989, the Constitutional Court rejected the

applicant's complaint.

COMPLAINTS

      The applicant has complained of the fine imposed on him and the

proceedings involved, alleging violations of Articles 5, 6, 7 and 10

of the Convention.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

      The application was introduced on 23 October 1989 and registered

on 10 January 1990.

      On 15 October 1991 the Commission decided to communicate the

application to the respondent Government with a request to submit

written observations on the admissibility and merits of the complaints

concerning Article 6 of the Convention.

      The respondent Government submitted their observations, after an

extension of the time-limit, on 6 and 20 March 1992.  The applicant

submitted his observations in reply on 6 May 1992.

      On 7 and 9 October 1992 the respondent Government informed the

Commission that pursuant to the applicant's administrative complaint

the Administrative Court had quashed the decision of the Carinthian

Security Directorate of 23 September 1988.  The Government submitted

a copy of the Administrative Court's decision of 4 August 1992.  On 21

October 1992, in reply to the respondent Government's letters of 7 and

9 October 1992, and in the light of the Administrative Court's decision

of 4 August 1992, the applicant informed the Commission that he wished

to withdraw his application.

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

      The Commission finds that the applicant regards the matter as

resolved and no longer intends to pursue his petition, within the

meaning of Article 30 para. 1(a) and (b) of the Convention.  Respect

for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the

examination of the application to be continued.

      For these reasons the Commission unanimously

      DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OUT OF ITS LIST OF CASES.

Secretary to the Commission                President of the Commission

       (H. C. KRÜGER)                            (C. A. NØRGAARD)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 393980 • Paragraphs parsed: 42814632 • Citations processed 3216094