Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PİŞKİN v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE koskelo
CASE OF WHITFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
CASE OF VAN RAALTE v. THE NETHERLANDSPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FOIGHEL
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S MYJER AND SAJÓ IN RESPECT OF THE COMPLAINT UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION
CASE OF McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE Sir Nicolas BRATZA
CASE OF FÖDERATION DER ALEVITEN GEMEINDEN IN ÖSTERREICH v. AUSTRIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VEHABOVIÄ†
CASE OF GÜLBAHAR ÖZER AND YUSUF ÖZER v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
CASE OF KRASUSKI v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 325/1999 of 12 February 1999 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

Document text Analytics

S.N. v. SWITZERLAND

Doc ref: 22406/93 • ECHR ID: 001-1676

Document date: September 10, 1993

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

C unique documents citing • 3 citations total to G paragraphs

Outbound citations

W unique documents cited • 3 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846