Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

VRATSIDIS v. GREECE

Doc ref: 22719/93 • ECHR ID: 001-2057

Document date: February 22, 1995

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

VRATSIDIS v. GREECE

Doc ref: 22719/93 • ECHR ID: 001-2057

Document date: February 22, 1995

Cited paragraphs only



                      Application No. 22719/93

                      by Jordanis VRATSIDIS

                      against Greece

     The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting

in private on 22 February 1995, the following members being present:

           Mrs.  J. LIDDY,  Acting President

           MM.   C.L. ROZAKIS

                 A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                 A. WEITZEL

                 M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

                 B. MARXER

                 B. CONFORTI

                 N. BRATZA

                 I. BÉKÉS

                 E. KONSTANTINOV

                 G. RESS

           Mrs.  M.F. BUQUICCHIO, Secretary to the Chamber

     Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

     Having regard to the application introduced on 19 July 1993 by

Jordanis VRATSIDIS against Greece and registered on 30 September 1993

under file No. 22719/93;

     Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission;

     Having deliberated;

     Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

     The applicant is a Greek citizen born in 1953 in Kazakhstan.

     The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the

applicant, can be summarised as follows:

     On 30 January 1979 the applicant was arrested at the

international airport of Rome by the Italian authorities on the basis

of an extradition request by the United Kingdom. He was held in

detention until 3 January 1981 when he was extradited on the orders of

the Court of Appeal of Florence.

     On 28 July 1981 a court in England found the applicant guilty of

a variety of offences and imposed on him the following sentences: life

imprisonment on one count of attempted murder, life imprisonment on a

second count of attempted murder, eighteen years imprisonment on a

count of robbery, fifteen years imprisonment on a second count of

robbery, two years imprisonment on a count of obtaining a passport by

deception and two years imprisonment on a second count of obtaining a

passport by deception. The overall result was that the applicant

received a sentence of life imprisonment to run concurrently with an

aggregate sentence of twenty two years imprisonment. The applicant

claims that the first review of his case by the Parole Board was fixed

for January 1994.

     On 8 August 1990 the applicant was transferred to Greece in order

to serve his sentence there in accordance with the European Convention

on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons.

     On 29 May 1991 the three-member first instance criminal court

(Trimeles Plimmeleiodikeio) of Athens considered that the sentences

imposed by the English criminal court were compatible with Greek

criminal law and found that the applicant should serve in Greece the

following sentences: life imprisonment on one count of attempted

murder, life imprisonment on a second count of attempted murder,

eighteen years imprisonment on a count of robbery, fifteen years

imprisonment on a second count of robbery, two years imprisonment on

a count of obtaining a passport by deception and two years imprisonment

on a second count of obtaining a passport by deception. The Greek court

refused to commute the applicant's sentences on the ground that he was

a particularly dangerous person.

     On 29 July 1991 the applicant lodged an appeal against the

decision of 29 May 1991 of the three-member first instance criminal

court with the Court of Cassation (Areios Pagos). He has not informed

the Commission of the grounds of his appeal.

     On 11 November 1991 he lodged a complaint with the Ministry of

Justice. He has failed to inform the Commission of the subject-matter

of his complaint.

     The hearing of the applicant's appeal in cassation was adjourned

on 6 December 1991 as a result of a lawyers' strike.

     By letter of 23 June 1992 the Ministry of Justice advised the

applicant that, if he disagreed with the manner in which the time he

had to spend in detention had been calculated, he should lodge an

application with the first instance criminal court of his place of

detention.

     The applicant lodged such an application with the first instance

criminal court of Corfu which was rejected on 10 June 1993.

COMPLAINTS

     The applicant complains of the failure of the Greek court, which

adapted the sentence imposed on him in England, to take account of the

fact that the overall sentence imposed on him by the English court was

a "discretionary" life sentence to run concurrently with an aggregate

of twenty two years of fixed terms of imprisonment. As a result, he

lost the opportunity to be released on parole in January 1994. He

invokes in this connection Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

     The Commission notes that by letter of 20 September 1994,

addressed to the prison of Alikarnassos where he was being detained,

the applicant was requested to provide additional information to the

Commission concerning the issue of exhaustion of domestic remedies and

to furnish copies of certain court decisions. The applicant having

failed to reply, a reminder was sent to him by registered mail with

"avis de reception" on 22 November 1994. The letter was returned

unopened, the applicant not being known in the Alikarnassos prison.

     Given the applicant's failure to reply to the Commission's

request for information and to indicate his new address, the Commission

concludes under Article 30 para. 1 (a) of the Convention that the

applicant no longer intends to pursue his petition. It further

considers that respect for Human Rights as defined in the Convention

does not require it to continue the examination of the application.

     For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously

     DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OUT OF THE LIST OF CASES.

     Secretary                             Acting President

to the First Chamber                     of the First Chamber

(M.F. BUQUICCHIO)                            (J. LIDDY)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255