Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NERVA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
Commission Regulation (EC) No 9/2008 of 8 January 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 233/77 of 2 February 1977 re-establishing the levying of the customs duties on carbonates of sodium anhydrite falling within subheading 28.42 A ex II originating in Romania to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3021/76 apply
CASE OF APANASEWICZ AGAINST POLAND
CASE OF MURDALOVY v. RUSSIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND KELLER
CASE OF TSONYO TSONEV AGAINST BULGARIA (No. 4)
CASE OF M.P. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF J.L. AGAINST LATVIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF MAHARRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
J.B. and Others v. Hungary (dec.)

Document text Analytics

OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 23728/94 • ECHR ID: 001-2177

Document date: May 16, 1995

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

m unique documents citing • T citations total to w paragraphs

Outbound citations

x unique documents cited • l citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707