J.D. v. HUNGARY
Doc ref: 25952/94 • ECHR ID: 001-2918
Document date: May 20, 1996
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
Application No. 25952/94
by J. D.
against Hungary
The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on
20 May 1996, the following members being present:
MM. S. TRECHSEL, President
H. DANELIUS
E. BUSUTTIL
G. JÖRUNDSSON
A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK
A. WEITZEL
J.-C. SOYER
H.G. SCHERMERS
Mrs. G.H. THUNE
Mr. F. MARTINEZ
Mrs. J. LIDDY
MM. L. LOUCAIDES
J.-C. GEUS
M.P. PELLONPÄÄ
B. MARXER
M.A. NOWICKI
I. CABRAL BARRETO
B. CONFORTI
N. BRATZA
I. BÉKÉS
J. MUCHA
E. KONSTANTINOV
D. SVÁBY
G. RESS
A. PERENIC
C. BÎRSAN
P. LORENZEN
K. HERNDL
Mr. H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission
Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Having regard to the application introduced on 4 April 1994 by
J. D. against Hungary and registered on 15 December 1994 under file
No. 25952/94;
Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules
of Procedure of the Commission;
Having deliberated;
Decides as follows:
THE FACTS
On 22 November 1992 J.D., of Albanian origin, was born out of
wedlock in Szeged, Hungary. The application has been lodged on his
behalf by Mr. Davies, who was appointed by J.D.'s natural mother on
15 February 1994.
The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by Mr. Davies,
may be summarised as follows.
On 8 December 1992 J.D.'s natural mother recorded a declaration
with a Hungarian notary public according to which she irrevocably
agreed to her son's adoption by Mr. and Mrs. S., a couple of US
nationality, allowing him to emigrate to the United States. The
adoption was organised by Mr. Davies. Subsequently J.D.'s natural
mother left Hungary. J.D. was provisionally taken care of by foster
parents paid for by the prospective adoptive parents. On 20 July 1993
the United States' Embassy issued an immigrant visa for J.D. In October
1993 J.D. was handed over to his adoptive parents in the United States.
COMPLAINTS
Mr. Davies complains on behalf of J.D. that the Hungarian
authorities, allegedly due to formalities, delayed his departure from
Hungary until October 1993, and that he could not challenge this delay.
He invokes Articles 3, 6 and 8 of the Convention as well as Article 2
of Protocol No. 4.
THE LAW
The present application relates to several complaints in respect
of the Hungarian authorities' alleged failure to authorise J.D. to
leave Hungary without delay. The application has been brought on behalf
of J.D., a minor, by Mr. Davies, who was appointed by the applicant's
natural mother on 15 February 1994. The Commission notes that in
December 1992 J.D.'s natural mother agreed to her son's adoption by
adoptive parents, with whom J.D. has been living since October 1993.
The Commission recalls that parents having neither the custody
nor the care of their children, and are not otherwise authorised to
represent them, cannot introduce an application on their behalf
(cf. No. 8045/77, Dec. 4.5.79, D.R. 16 p. 105). Consequently, in
February 1994 J.D.'s natural mother was no longer in a position to
appoint Mr. Davies as her son's representative for the purposes of a
petition under Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention. In these
circumstances, the Commission finds that Mr. Davies is not competent
to bring the present complaints on behalf of J.D.
It follows that the application is incompatible ratione personae
with the Convention within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2
(Art. 27-2) of the Convention.
For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,
DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE.
Secretary to the Commission President of the Commission
(H.C. KRÜGER) (S. TRECHSEL)
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
