HOLZINGER v. AUSTRIA
Doc ref: 28898/95 • ECHR ID: 001-3410
Document date: November 27, 1996
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
Application No. 28898/95
by Adolf HOLZINGER
against Austria
The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting
in private on 27 November 1996, the following members being present:
Mrs. J. LIDDY, President
MM. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ
E. BUSUTTIL
A. WEITZEL
L. LOUCAIDES
B. CONFORTI
N. BRATZA
I. BÉKÉS
G. RESS
C. BÎRSAN
K. HERNDL
M. VILA AMIGÓ
Mrs. M.F. BUQUICCHIO, Secretary to the Chamber
Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Having regard to the application introduced on 28 June 1995 by
Adolf HOLZINGER against Austria and registered on 9 October 1995 under
file No. 28898/95;
Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules
of Procedure of the Commission;
Having deliberated;
Decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant is an Austrian citizen, born in 1934. He lives in
Hallein. The facts of the application, as submitted by the applicant,
may be summarised as follows.
On 8 July 1987 the applicant brought proceedings (17 C 1018/87)
in the Salzburg District Court (Bezirksgericht) against a former lawyer
for the sum of AS 11,294.05. The lawyer objected, and a hearing was
held on 25 January 1988. The court decided to adjourn the proceedings
until other proceedings (20 SW 2/87) were determined. Those
proceedings were determined on 15 March 1988, and the applicant
requested the continuation of the proceedings 17 C 1018/87, adding to
the amount claimed.
From November 1988 the applicant was represented by a lawyer, but
continued to make applications to the court.
A second hearing took place on 1 December 1989. The court
adjourned the case pending the outcome of parallel proceedings against
the same defendant. The applicant made further applications for the
proceedings to be continued, and from 1 January 1994 the applicant
again represented himself.
On 12 December 1994 a fresh hearing was held, because a new judge
was dealing with the case. The proceedings were adjourned sine die for
the court to obtain all the files.
On 16 January 1995 the defendant died.
The proceedings ended when the applicant, by letter of 29 June
1995, requested their discontinuation on the ground that he would no
longer be able to recover the money in any event.
COMPLAINTS
The applicant alleges violation of Article 6 of the Convention.
He complains of the length of the proceedings - which lasted some eight
years without even a first instance judgment - and also alleges
unfairness, without giving any details.
THE LAW
1. The applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1)
of the Convention by reason of the length of the proceedings.
The Commission considers that it cannot, on the basis of the
file, determine the admissibility of this complaint and that it is
therefore necessary, in accordance with Rule 48 para. 2 (b) of the
Rules of Procedure, to give notice of this complaint to the respondent
Government.
2. The applicant also claims that the proceedings were unfair, and
in violation of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention.
However, the applicant has failed to make any submissions on the
fairness of the proceedings, and in any event, they never advanced to
a first instance decision, and appear ultimately to have been
terminated on the applicant's request.
It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill-
founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the
Convention.
For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,
DECIDES TO ADJOURN the examination of the applicant's
complaint concerning the length of the proceedings, and
DECLARES INADMISSIBLE the remainder of the application.
M.F. BUQUICCHIO J. LIDDY
Secretary President
to the First Chamber of the First Chamber
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
