Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BUKHARATYAN v. ARMENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GYULUMYAN
Council Decision (EU) 2019/304 of 18 February 2019 concerning the notification by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish no longer to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which are contained in Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004 on the creation of an immigration liaison officers network
Commission Regulation (EC) No 307/2003 of 18 February 2003 fixing export refunds on fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2284/2000 of 13 October 2000 opening an invitation to tender for the refund on export of wholly milled long grain rice to certain third countries
CASE OF TEŠIĆ v. SERBIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
CASE OF HOFFMANN v. GERMANYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PELLONPÄÄ
CASE OF G.L. v. ITALY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1979/2006 of 22 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for preserved mushrooms imported from third countries
CASE OF HARRISON McKEE v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAJEWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

Document text Analytics

OCIC v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 46306/99 • ECHR ID: 001-4949

Document date: November 25, 1999

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

s unique documents citing • f citations total to S paragraphs

Outbound citations

h unique documents cited • d citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846