Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KOHLHOFER AND MINARIK AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CASE OF MACOVEI AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA
CASE OF RUIZ-MATEOS v. SPAINPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI, APPROVED BY JUDGES LOPES ROCHA AND RUIZ-JARABO COLOMER
CASE OF TEŠIĆ v. SERBIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1128/2005 of 14 July 2005 laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under the tariff quota for corn opened by Regulation (EC) No 958/2003
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2129/2004 of 14 December 2004 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
CASE OF MANTOVANELLI AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF JOHN ANTHONY MIZZI v. MALTADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCICLUNA

Document text Analytics

OCIC v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 46306/99 • ECHR ID: 001-4949

Document date: November 25, 1999

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

G unique documents citing • H citations total to R paragraphs

Outbound citations

t unique documents cited • 6 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846