Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES ROZAKIS AND VAJIĆ
Regulation (EEC) No 1311/73 of the Commission of 16 May 1973 relating to a provisional list of quality wines produced in specified regions as well as the identification of these wines in the accompanying document
CASE OF PAMMEL v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FOIGHEL
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 15/76 of 7 January 1976 determining the world market price for colza and rape seed
CASE OF NÖLKENBOCKHOFF v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CREMONA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4/90 of 3 January 1990 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 5 September 2012. João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge.
CASE OF GÜL v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE G ÖLCÜKLÜ
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 288/96 of 14 February 1996 fixing the import duties in the rice sector
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 112/77 of 20 January 1977 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 March 2011.

Altstoff Recycling Austria AG v European Commission.

T-419/03 • 62003TJ0419 • ECLI:EU:T:2011:102

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 28

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

F unique documents citing • r citations total to x paragraphs

Outbound citations

S9 unique documents cited • Po citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846