Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF HASSELBAINK v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF RUSU LINTAX S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF VARNIENĖ AGAINST LITHUANIA
VERENIGING RECHTSWINKELS UTRECHT v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF L.G.S. S.P.A. v. ITALY (No. 2)
Regulation (EEC) No 345/71 of the Commission of 17 February 1971 amending Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 571/70 determining the list of egg products covered by the provisions for the advance fixing of export refunds and the destination of such products
CASE OF MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD v. ROMANIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES YUDKIVSKA, MOTOC AND PACZOLAY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1077/2008 of 3 November 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1566/2007
CASE OF HENTRICH v. FRANCE (INTERPRETATION)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Regulation (EEC) No 1388/70 of the Council of 13 July 1970 on general rules for the classification of vine varieties

Document text Analytics

CASE OF I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 29522/95;30056/96;30574/96 • ECHR ID: 001-58800

Document date: September 19, 2000

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

X unique documents cited • n citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846