Browsing history:

↳
TRIF v. ROMANIA
WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND (NO. 2)
ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN
HADJITHOMAS, HADJITHOMA, HADJITHOMA-HAPESHI, HADJITHOMAS, ANTONIOU-HADJITHOMA AND HADJITHOMAS v. TURKEY
X. v. AUSTRIA
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 167/98 of 23 January 1998 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled medium grain and long grain A rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2096/97
Commission Regulation (EC) No 531/2002 of 22 March 2002 concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled round grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2007/2001
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1841 of 5 October 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 36/78 of 9 January 1978 on certain special cases as regards the application of the system of premiums for the non-marketing of milk and milk products and for the conversion of dairy herds
PAUGER v. AUSTRIADISSENTING OPINION OF MM. C.L. ROZAKIS, E. BUSUTTIL, A. WEITZEL,

Document text Analytics

BURDOV v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 59498/00 • ECHR ID: 001-5944

Document date: June 21, 2001

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

B unique documents cited • 4 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846