Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EU) No 412/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
CASE OF SCHENKEL v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF TURKIYE IS BANKASI AGAINST FINLAND
CASE OF HORNSBY v. GREECEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS
CASE OF POITRIMOL v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 24/2000 of 6 January 2000 fixing the maximum export refund on rye in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1758/1999
CASE OF STEPHENS v. MALTA (No. 1)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 372/2006 of 2 March 2006 fixing the representative prices and the additional import duties for molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 3 March 2006
CASE OF KAZANTSEV v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF PODKOLZINA v. LATVIA

Doc ref: 46726/99 • ECHR ID: 001-60417

Document date: April 9, 2002

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

7 unique documents cited • q citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846