Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2006. Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission of the European Communities.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 862/91 of 8 April 1991 laying down detailed rules applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 to imports of rice originating in Bangladesh
Judgment of the Court of 30 September 2003. Freistaat Sachsen (C-57/00 P) and Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Sachsen GmbH (C-61/00 P) v Commission of the European Communities.
CASE OF SC MASINEXPORTIMPORT INDUSTRIAL GROUP SA AGAINST ROMANIA
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 1990. Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA.
Judgment of the Court of 28 September 1994. Maria Nelleke Gerda van den Akker and others v Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 4078/88 of 19 December 1988 opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for cut flowers and flower buds, fresh, originating in Israel (1988/89)
Council Regulation (EC) No 3057/95 of 22 December 1995 amending Regulation (EC) No 1981/94 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain products originating in Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Malta, Morocco, the Occupied Territories, Tunisia and Turkey, and providing detailed rules for extending and adapting these tariff quotas
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 December 2005. Commission of the European Communities v Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum eV.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 991/93 of 23 April 1993 extending the measures taken under the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the United States of America for the conclusion of negotiations under GATT Article XXIV.6

Document text Analytics

CASE OF NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 54825/00 • ECHR ID: 001-68715

Document date: April 5, 2005

Inbound citations: 124
•
Cited paragraphs: 30
•
Outbound citations: 43

Separate Opinions

Browse separate opinions available for this document.

PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MULARONI

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846