Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3560/91 of 6 December 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 859/89 laying down detailed rules for the application of intervention measures in the beef and veal sector
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2658/93 of 29 September 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 584/92 laying down detailed rules for the application to milk and milk products of the arrangements provided for in the Interim Agreements between the Community and the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and Regulation (EEC) No 2357/93 determining the quantities of certain categories of milk and milk products available for the fourth quarter of 1993 under the arrangements provided for in the Interim Agreements
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 204/85 of 25 January 1985 fixing the export refunds on rice and broken rice
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2001. J.R. Bowden, J.L. Chapman and J.J. Doyle v Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd.
Judgment of the Court of 30 April 1974. R. & V. Haegeman v Belgian State.
CASE OF PÁKOZDI AGAINST HUNGARY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 of 23 September 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal
Council Regulation (EEC) No 4150/87 of 21 December 1987 laying down arrangements for Spain's and Portugal's trade with Yugoslavia and amending Regulation (EEC) No 449/86 and No 2573/87
Council Directive 84/647/EEC of 19 December 1984 on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2776/90 of 27 September 1990 on transitional measures to be applied in the wine sector after the unification of Germany in the territory of the former German Democratic Republic

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ELLI POLUHAS DÖDSBO v. SWEDEN

Doc ref: 61564/00 • ECHR ID: 001-72033

Document date: January 17, 2006

Inbound citations: 19
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 6

Separate Opinions

Browse separate opinions available for this document.

JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TÃœRMEN, UGREKHELIDZE AND MULARONI

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846