Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DEMİR AND BAYKARA v. TURKEYSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
Council Directive 82/884/EEC of 3 December 1982 on a limit value for lead in the air
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 95/2012 of 6 February 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 1125/2010 as regards the intervention centres for cereals in Germany
CASE OF GUZZARDI v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
CASE OF BARALIJA AGANST BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. TURKEY
CASE OF GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF ALFATLı AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY (as regards the applicant Mahmut Memduh Uyan)
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3664/91 of 16 December 1991 laying down transitional measures for aromatized wines, aromatized wine-based drinks and aromatized wine- product cocktails
Council Regulation (EC) No 2073/2004 of 16 November 2004 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Doc ref: 17224/11 • ECHR ID: 001-175180

Document date: June 27, 2017

Inbound citations: 97
•
Cited paragraphs: 22
•
Outbound citations: 113

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Ks unique documents citing • rKW citations total to A7 paragraphs

Outbound citations

QI unique documents cited • CIV citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846