Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SILVIS
CASE OF AL-JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POALELUNGI
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 of 22 April 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
CASE OF GERASIMOVA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
CASE OF AUTRONIC AG v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT AND MATSCHER
CASE OF ÜNER v. THE NETHERLANDSJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES COSTA, ZUPANČIČ AND TÜRMEN
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2139/93 of 28 July 1993 amending Regulations (EEC) No 1913/92 and (EEC) No 2255/92 laying down detailed implementing rules for the specific measures for supplying the Azores and Madeira with products from the beef and veal sector
CASE OF PETROPOULOU-TSAKIRIS v. GREECEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
CASE OF KARATAS AND SARI AGAINST FRANCE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BARTHOLD v. GERMANY

Doc ref: 8734/79 • ECHR ID: 001-57432

Document date: March 25, 1985

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Y unique documents citing • g citations total to v paragraphs

Outbound citations

M unique documents cited • A citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846