Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CSANADI v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BECERIKLI AND ALTEKIN v. TURKEY
CASE OF TENCE v. SLOVENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF TERSHIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF PFEIFENBERGER v. AUSTRIA
PIERSACK CASE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1820/95 of 26 July 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2257/92 laying down detailed rules for implementation of the specific arrangements for supplying Madeira with certain vegetable oils and establishing a forecast balance, and amending Regulation (EC) No 2883/94 establishing a forecast balance for the supply to the Canary Islands of agricultural products covered by the specific measures provided for in Articles 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92
CASE OF ÇİÇEK AND ÖZTEMEL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ANDREY MEDVEDEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF PAMUK v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FINDLAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 22107/93 • ECHR ID: 001-58016

Document date: February 25, 1997

Inbound citations: 10
•
Cited paragraphs: 7
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

L9 unique documents citing • SU citations total to G paragraphs

Outbound citations

n unique documents cited • R citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846