Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NASRI v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
CASE OF DURSUN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3686/84 of 19 December 1984 amending Regulation (EEC) No 358/79 on sparkling wines produced in the Community and defined in point 13 of Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 337/79
CASE OF YEFIMENKO v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
Regulation (EC) No 1267/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 with respect to the time limit for transmission of the main aggregates of national accounts, to the derogations concerning the transmission of the main aggregates of national accounts and to the transmission of employment data in hours worked (Text with EEA relevance)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 66/2008 of 25 January 2008 opening a yearly tariff quota for 2008 and the following years applicable to the importation into the European Community of certain goods originating in Norway resulting from the processing of agricultural products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93
CASE OF THOMPSON v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
CASE OF DALA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MIRONOV v. UKRAINE
Council Regulation (EC) No 2870/95 of 8 December 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy

Document text Analytics

CASE OF AHRENS v. GERMANY

Doc ref: 45071/09 • ECHR ID: 001-109815

Document date: March 22, 2012

Inbound citations: 10
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 18

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

lF unique documents citing • Ab citations total to Q paragraphs

Outbound citations

A9 unique documents cited • DC citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846