Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF LAURENT AGAINST FRANCE
M. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HIRSCHHORN v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CAFLISCH, JOINED BY JUDGE ZIEMELE
OZGUDEN AND TUGSAVUL v. TURKEY
Council Regulation (EEC) No 767/89 of 20 March 1989 fixing the intervention price for butter from 1 April 1989
Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2007 of 17 January 2007 correcting the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish versions of Regulation (EEC) No 821/68 on the definition, applicable to the granting of export refunds, of hulled grains and pearled grains of cereals
CASE OF ROSATI v. ITALY
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 187/2013 of 5 March 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance ethylene Text with EEA relevance
ÖZCAN v. TURKEY
PAO PROMSVYAZBANK v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF V.M. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

Doc ref: 60125/11 • ECHR ID: 001-169047

Document date: November 17, 2016

Inbound citations: 50
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

7C unique documents citing • Qw citations total to w paragraphs

Outbound citations

tS unique documents cited • 5l citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707