Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF İZCİ v. TURKEY
CASE OF ATANASOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
CASE OF ARVANITAKI-ROBOTI AND OTHERS v. GREECEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ZUPANČIČ AND ZAGREBELSKY
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2179/88 of 18 July 1988 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1873/84 authorizing the offer of disposal for direct human consumption of certain imported wines which may have undergone oenological processes not provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 337/79
CASE OF EL GHATET v. SWITZERLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES

Document text Analytics

CASE OF XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. v. POLAND

Doc ref: 4907/18 • ECHR ID: 001-210065

Document date: May 7, 2021

Inbound citations: 27
•
Cited paragraphs: 15
•
Outbound citations: 70

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Q9 unique documents citing • 4f citations total to bc paragraphs

Outbound citations

TS unique documents cited • UT citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846