Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

JOHANSSON v. SWEDEN

Doc ref: 14006/88 • ECHR ID: 001-45605

Document date: June 30, 1993

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

JOHANSSON v. SWEDEN

Doc ref: 14006/88 • ECHR ID: 001-45605

Document date: June 30, 1993

Cited paragraphs only



                  EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

                            SECOND CHAMBER

                       Application No. 14006/88

                           Barbro Johansson

                                against

                                Sweden

                       REPORT OF THE COMMISSION

                       (adopted on 30 June 1993)

                           TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

PART I:  STATEMENT OF THE FACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

PART II: SOLUTION REACHED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

                             INTRODUCTION

1.    This Report relates to the application introduced under

Article 25 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by Mrs. Barbro Johansson against Sweden

on 5 March 1988. It was registered on 8 July 1988 under file

No. 14006/88.

      The applicant was represented by Mr. Göran Ravnsborg, lecturer

at the University of Lund.

      The Government of Sweden were represented by their Agent,

Mr. Carl Henrik Ehrenkrona, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm.

2.    On 30 November 1992 the Commission declared admissible the

applicant's complaint relating to the absence of a court remedy against

the refusal to grant her a retention permit. The remainder of the

application was declared inadmissible and the case referred to the

Second Chamber. The Commission (Second Chamber) then proceeded to carry

out its tasks under Article 28 para. 1 of the Convention which provides

as follows:

      "In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to

      it:

      a.   it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake

           together with the representatives of the parties an

           examination of the petition and, if need be, an

           investigation, for the effective conduct of which the

           States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities,

           after an exchange of views with the Commission;

      b.   it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of

           the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly

           settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for Human

           Rights as defined in this Convention."

3.    The Commission found that the parties had reached a friendly

settlement of the case and on 30 June 1993 it adopted this Report,

which, in accordance with Article 28 para. 2 of the Convention, is

confined to a brief statement of the facts and of the solution reached.

        The following members were present when the Report was adopted:

           MM.   S. TRECHSEL, President of the Second Chamber

                 G. JÖRUNDSSON

                 A. WEITZEL

                 J.-C. SOYER

                 H.G. SCHERMERS

                 H. DANELIUS

           Mrs.  G.H. THUNE

           MM.   F. MARTINEZ

                 L. LOUCAIDES

                 J.-C. GEUS

                 M.A. NOWICKI

                 I. CABRAL BARRETO

                                PART I

                        STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

4.    The applicant is a Swedish citizen born in 1932 and resident at

Mörlunda. She is a nurse by profession.

5.    In 1984 the applicant bought an agricultural property at a

compulsory auction.

6.    On 3 February 1987 the County Agricultural Board (lantbruks-

nämnden) of the County of Jönköping rejected the applicant's request

under the 1979 Land Acquisition Act (jordförvärvslag 1979:230) for

permission to retain the property.

7.    On 20 May 1987 the National Board of Agriculture (lantbruks-

styrelsen) rejected the applicant's appeal.

8.    On 10 September 1987 the Government rejected the applicant's

further appeal.

9.    Before the Commission the applicant complained, inter alia, that

she had no court remedy against the refusal to grant her permission to

retain her property. She invoked Article 6 para. 1 and Article 13 of

the Convention.

                                PART II

                           SOLUTION REACHED

10.   Following the decision on the admissibility of the application,

the Commission (Second Chamber) placed itself at the disposal of the

parties with a view to securing a friendly settlement in accordance

with Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the Convention and invited the parties

to submit any proposals they wished to make.

11.   In accordance with the usual practice, the Chamber Secretary,

acting on the Commission's instructions, contacted the parties to

explore the possibilities of reaching a friendly settlement.

12.   Following an exchange of letters between the parties the Agent

of the Government, by letter of 4 May 1993, submitted the following

agreement reached between the applicant and the Government:

                           "SETTLEMENT

      On 30 November 1992 the European Commission of Human Rights

      decided to declare admissible Application No. 14006/88 lodged by

      Mrs. Barbro Johansson against Sweden.

      The Government and Mrs. Johansson have now reached the following

      friendly settlement on the basis of respect for Human Rights as

      defined in the Convention in order to terminate the proceedings

      before the Commission.

      a.   The Government will pay the sum of SEK 10,000 to the

      applicant.

      b.   The Government will pay the applicant's legal costs in the

      amount of SEK 35,000.

      c.   Mrs. Johansson declares that she has no further claims in

      the matter based on the facts dealt with in the above decision

      of the Commission of 30 November 1992.

      This settlement is dependent upon the formal approval of the

      Government.

      Stockholm, 29 March 1993                 Lund, 31 March 1993

              (signed)                            (signed)

      Carl Henrik Ehrenkrona                   Göran Ravnsborg

      Agent of the Swedish                     Counsel for the

      Government                               applicant"

13.   On 15 April 1993 the above agreement was formally approved by the

Government.

14.   At its session on 30 June 1993, the Commission noted that the

parties had reached an agreement regarding the terms of a settlement.

It further considered, having regard to Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the

Convention, that the friendly settlement of the case had been secured

on the basis of respect for Human Rights as defined in the Convention.

15.   For these reasons, the Commission adopted this Report.

Secretary to the Second Chamber       President of the Second Chamber

          (K. ROGGE)                            (S. TRECHSEL)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255