Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

A.S. v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 15220/89 • ECHR ID: 001-45622

Document date: October 15, 1993

  • Inbound citations: 3
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

A.S. v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 15220/89 • ECHR ID: 001-45622

Document date: October 15, 1993

Cited paragraphs only



                  EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

                       Application No. 15220/89

                                 A. S.

                                against

                                Austria

                       REPORT OF THE COMMISSION

                     (adopted on 15 October 1993)

                           TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                 Page

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

PART I:  STATEMENT OF THE FACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

PART II: SOLUTION REACHED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

                             INTRODUCTION

1.    This Report relates to the application introduced under

Article 25 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by A.S. against Austria on 5 June 1989.

It was registered on 19 July 1989 under file No. 15220/89.

      The applicant was represented by Mr. T. Prader, a lawyer

practising in Vienna.

      The Government of Austria were represented by their Agent,

Mr. F. Cede, Ambassador, Head of the International Law Department at

the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

2.    On 3 May 1993 the Commission declared admissible the applicant's

complaints under Article 8 of the Convention regarding his surveillance

by the police from 1970 to 1978 and the storing of the data so

obtained, and to this extent also the complaint under Article 13 of the

Convention, and declared inadmissible the remainder of the

application.  It then proceeded to carry out its task under Article

28 para. 1 of the Convention which provides as follows:

      "In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to

      it:

      a.   it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake

           together with the representatives of the parties an

           examination of the petition and, if need be, an

           investigation, for the effective conduct of which the

           States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities,

           after an exchange of views with the Commission;

      b.   it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of

           the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly

           settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for Human

           Rights as defined in this Convention."

3.    The Commission found that the parties had reached a friendly

settlement of the case and on 15 October 1993 it adopted this Report,

which, in accordance with Article 28 para. 2 of the Convention, is

confined to a brief statement of the facts and of the solution reached.

      The following members were present when the Report was adopted:

           MM.   C.A. NØRGAARD, President

                 S. TRECHSEL

                 A. WEITZEL

                 F. ERMACORA

                 E. BUSUTTIL

                 G. JÖRUNDSSON

                 A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                 J.-C. SOYER

                 H.G. SCHERMERS

                 H. DANELIUS

           Mrs.  G.H. THUNE

           MM.   F. MARTINEZ

                 C.L. ROZAKIS

           Mrs.  J. LIDDY

           MM.   J.-C. GEUS

                 M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

                 B. MARXER

                 G.B. REFFI

                 M.A. NOWICKI

                 I. CABRAL BARRETO

                 B. CONFORTI

                 N. BRATZA

                                PART I

                        STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

4.    The applicant, born in 1950, is an Austrian national resident in

Vienna.  On 25 March 1983 the applicant unsuccessfully applied for the

post of a librarian at the Federal Chancellery.

5.    On 15 May 1988 he received from an anonymous sender a copy of his

personal file which had been established by the Federal Chancellery

upon his job application in 1983. It appeared from this file that the

Federal Chancellery had ordered police investigations in respect of the

applicant.  The file contained, inter alia, a report by the Vienna

Federal Police Department (Bundespolizeidirektion) on police

investigations carried out between 1970 and 1978.  The applicant's

complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)

remained unsuccessful.  On 7 November 1991 the Data Protection

Commission (Datenschutzkommission) found that the Vienna Federal Police

Department had violated Section 1 para. 1 of the Data Protection Act

(Datenschutzgesetz) by transferring several data to the Federal

Chancellery.

6.    Before the Commission the applicant complained under Article 8

para. 1 of the Convention that the police surveillance from 1970 until

1978, the storage of the data compiled during that period and their

transfer to the Federal Chancellery violated his right to respect for

his private life and that he had no effective remedy within the meaning

of Article 13 of the Convention against those violations.

7.    On 1 May 1993 the Security Police Act (Sicherheitspolizei-

gesetz) entered into force which regulates the collecting and

processing of personal data by police authorities.

                                PART II

                           SOLUTION REACHED

8.    Following the decision on the admissibility of the application,

the Commission placed itself at the disposal of the parties with a view

to securing a friendly settlement in accordance with Article 28

para. 1 (b) of the Convention and invited the parties to submit any

proposals they wished to make.

9.    In accordance with the usual practice, the Secretary to the

Commission, acting on the Commission's instructions, contacted the

parties to explore the possibilities of reaching a friendly settlement.

10.   By letters of 17 August and 6 September 1993 the parties

submitted the following agreement reached between them:

      "Erklärungen der Parteien zur gütlichen Regelung

      In der Beschwerdesache Nr. 15220/89 des Herrn (Name des

Beschwerdeführers) einigen sich die Parteien unter Bezugnahme auf

Artikel 28 Abs. 1 lit. b der Europäischen Konvention zum Schutze der

Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten und unter Mitwirkung der

Europäischen Kommission für Menschenrechte auf die nachstehende

gütliche Regelung:

      1.   Die österreichische Regierung zahlt dem Beschwerdeführer

      als Ausgleich für sämtliche etwaige Ansprüche im Zusammenhang mit

      der vorliegenden Beschwerde einen Gesamtbetrag von öS 130.000,--.

      Dieser Betrag umfaßt öS 50.000,-- hinsichtlich der Gebühren und

      Auslagen, die im Rahmen des Verfahrens vor der Kommission

      entstanden sind.

      Dieser Betrag wird an den Verfahrensbevollmächtigten des

      Beschwerdeführers Herrn Rechtsanwalt Dr. Thomas Prader in Wien

      überwiesen.

      2.   Die Republik Österreich verpflichtet sich, die den

      Beschwerdeführer betreffende Karteikarte, die im Zuge der

      Ermittlungen über seine Person angelegt wurde und die noch

      Vorhanden ist, zu vernichten.

      3.   Der Beschwerdeführer erklärt seine oben genannte Beschwerde

      als erledigt.

      4.   Der Beschwerdeführer verzichtet auf die Geltendmachung

      allfälliger weiterer Forderungen gegen die Republik Österreich

      im Zusammenhang mit dem der Beschwerde zugrundeliegenden

      Sachverhalt."

      "Statements of the parties with a view to a friendly settlement

      With reference to Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the European

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,

the parties in the proceedings concerning Application No. 15220/89,

lodged by Mr. (name of the applicant), declare with a view to a

friendly settlement, reached with assistance of the European Commission

of Human Rights, as follows:

      1.   The Government of the Republic of Austria will pay to the

      applicant a sum amounting to altogether AS 130,000 as

      compensation in respect of any possible claims relating to the

      present application.  This sum includes AS 50,000 in respect of

      counsel's fees and expenses incurred in the proceedings before

      the Commission.

      This amount will be paid to the applicant's representative

      Mr. Thomas Prader in Vienna.

      2.   The Republic of Austria undertakes to destroy the

      applicant's file card which was established in the course of the

      investigations concerning him and which is still in existence.

      3.   The applicant declares his application settled.

      4.   The applicant waives any further claims against the

      Republic of Austria relating to the present application."

11.   At its session on 15 October 1993, the Commission noted that the

parties had reached an agreement regarding the terms of a settlement.

The Commission further noted that on 1 May 1993 the Security Police Act

had entered into force which regulates the collecting and processing

of personal data by police authorities.

      The Commission considered, having regard to Article 28

para. 1 (b) of the Convention, that the friendly settlement of the case

had been secured on the basis of respect for Human Rights as defined

in the Convention.

12.   For these reasons, the Commission adopted this Report.

Deputy Secretary to the Commission          President of the Commission

       (M. de SALVIA)                             (C.A. NORGAARD)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255