KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA
Doc ref: 19165/91 • ECHR ID: 001-45736
Document date: June 28, 1995
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
FIRST CHAMBER
Application No. 19165/91
Friedrich Wilhelm Kremzow
against
Austria
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION
(adopted on 28 June 1995)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1
PART I: STATEMENT OF THE FACTS .......................... 3
PART II: SOLUTION REACHED ................................ 4
INTRODUCTION
1. This Report relates to the application introduced under
Article 25 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by Friedrich Wilhelm Kremzow against
Austria on 4 October 1991. It was registered on 6 December 1991 under
file No. 19165/91.
The applicant was initially represented by Messrs. W.L. Weh and
H. Mühlgassner, lawyers practising in Bregenz and Vienna respectively
and subsequently by Mr. R. Soyer, a lawyer practising in Vienna.
The Government of Austria were represented by their Agent,
Mr. F. Cede, Ambassador, Head of the International Law Department at
the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
2. On 30 November 1994 the Commission (First Chamber) declared
admissible the applicant's complaint under Article 6 para. 1 of the
Convention relating to the length of the proceedings and declared
inadmissible the remainder of the application. It then proceeded to
carry out its task under Article 28 para. 1 of the Convention which
provides as follows:
"In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to
it:
a. it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake
together with the representatives of the parties an
examination of the petition and, if need be, an
investigation, for the effective conduct of which the
States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities,
after an exchange of views with the Commission;
b. it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of
the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly
settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for Human
Rights as defined in this Convention."
3. The Commission (First Chamber) found that the parties had reached
a friendly settlement of the case and on 28 June 1995 it adopted this
Report, which, in accordance with Article 28 para. 2 of the Convention,
is confined to a brief statement of the facts and of the solution
reached.
The following members were present when the Report was adopted:
Mr. H. DANELIUS, President
Mrs. G.H. THUNE
MM. G. JÖRUNDSSON
S. TRECHSEL
J.-C. SOYER
H.G. SCHERMERS
F. MARTINEZ
L. LOUCAIDES
J.-C. GEUS
M.A. NOWICKI
I. CABRAL BARRETO
J. MUCHA
D. SVÁBY
PART I
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
4. The applicant, born in 1938, is an Austrian national.
5. On 29 June 1984 the Tax Office (Finanzamt) for the 6th, 7th and
15th District of Vienna instituted criminal proceedings under the Code
of Tax Offences (Finanzstrafgesetz) against the applicant on suspicion
of evasion of taxes. On 18 December 1987 the applicant unsuccessfully
requested that the criminal proceedings be transferred to the Regional
Tax Authority for Vienna, Lower Austria and the Burgenland (Finanz-
landesdirektion). On 9 May 1988 the Tax Office instructed the
applicant to submit a written statement on the charges raised against
him. On 18 May 1992 the applicant's case file was transmitted to the
Trial Board (Spruchsenat) which on 25 June 1992 discontinued the
criminal proceedings against the applicant. The applicant complains
of the length of proceedings instituted against him and invokes
Article 6 of the Convention.
PART II
SOLUTION REACHED
6. Following the decision on the admissibility of the application,
the Commission placed itself at the disposal of the parties with a view
to securing a friendly settlement in accordance with Article 28
para. 1 (b) of the Convention and invited the parties to submit any
proposals they wished to make.
7. In accordance with the usual practice, the Chamber Secretary,
acting on the Commission's instructions, contacted the parties to
explore the possibilities of reaching a friendly settlement.
8. By letter of 24 April 1995 the parties submitted the following
agreement reached between them:
9. "Statements of the parties with a view to a friendly settlement
With reference to Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the European
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
the parties in the proceedings concerning Application No. 18273/91,
lodged by Mr. Friedrich Wilhelm Kremzow, declare with a view to a
friendly settlement as follows:
1. The Government of the Republic of Austria will pay to the
applicant a sum of altogether AS 65,000 as compensation in
respect of any possible claims relating to the present
application. This sum includes AS 15,000 in respect of counsels'
fees and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the
Commission.
This amount will be paid to the applicants' representative Mr.
Richard Soyer in Vienna.
2. The applicant declares his application settled.
3. The applicant waives any further claims against the
Republic of Austria relating to the present application."
"Erklärungen der Parteien zur gütlichen Regelung
In der Beschwerdesache Nr. 19165/91 des Herrn Friedrich Wilhelm
Kremzow einigen sich die Parteien unter Bezugnahme auf Artikel 28 Abs.
1 lit. b der Europäischen Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und
Grundfreiheiten auf die nachstehende gütliche Regelung:
1. Die österreichische Regierung zahlt dem Beschwerdeführ als
Ausgleich für sämtliche etwaige Ansprüche im Zusammenhang mit der
vorliegenden Beschwerde einen Gesamtbetrag von öS 65,000. Dieser
Betrag umfaßt öS 15,000 hinsichtlich der Gebühren und Auslagen,
die im Rahmen des Verfahrens vor der Kommission entstanden sind.
Dieser Betrag wird an den Verfahrensbevollmächtigten des
Beschwerdeführers, Herrn Rechtsanwalt Dr. Richard Soyer in Wien,
überwiesen.
2. Der Beschwerdeführer erklärt seine oben genannte Beschwerde
als erledigt.
3. Der Beschwerdeführer verzichtet auf die Geltendmachung
allfälliger weiterer Forderungen gegen die Republik Österreich
im Zusammenhang mit dem der Beschwerde zugrundeliegenden
Sachverhalt."
10. At its session on 28 June 1995, the Commission noted that the
parties had reached an agreement regarding the terms of a settlement.
If further considered, having regard to Article 28 para. 1 (b)
of the Convention, that the friendly settlement of the case had been
secured on the basis of respect for Human Rights as defined in the
Convention.
11. For these reasons, the Commission adopted this Report.
Secretary to the First Chamber President of the First Chamber
(M. F. BUQUICCHIO) (C.L. ROZAKIS)
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
