Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CHA'ARE SHALOM VE TSEDEK v. FRANCEJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGEs Sir Nicolas Bratza, FISCHBACH, thomassen, tsatsa ‑ nikolovska, panŢÎRU, LEVITS and traja
Council Regulation (EC) No 1101/95 of 24 April 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 on the common organization of the market in the sugar sector and Regulation (EEC) No 1010/86 laying down general rules for the production refund on certain sugar products used in the chemical industry
CASE OF GARDEL v. FRANCE
CASE OF BERLAND v. FRANCE
CASE OF HERMI v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZUPANÄŒIÄŒ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 33/91 of 7 January 1991 fixing the amount of the subsidy on oil seeds
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 465/98 of 26 February 1998 fixing production refunds on cereals and rice
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3929/87 of 17 December 1987 on harvest, production and stock declarations relating to wine-sector products

Document text Analytics

FITT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 29777/96 • ECHR ID: 001-46149

Document date: October 20, 1998

Inbound citations: 42
•
Cited paragraphs: 9
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

ah unique documents citing • o4 citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

4 unique documents cited • h citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707