Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF GODELLI v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJO
CASE OF McELHINNEY v. IRELANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES CAFLISCH, CABRAL BARRETO AND VAJIĆ
Commission Directive 2003/70/EC of 17 July 2003 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include mecoprop, mecoprop-P and propiconazole as active substances (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
Commission Regulation (EU) No 183/2010 of 3 March 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SILVIS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 598/2003 of 1 April 2003 on periodical sales by tender of beef held by certain intervention agencies
CASE OF McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE COSTA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2007 of 6 December 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF JOANNOU v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BIANKU

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020. I.G.I. Srl v Maria Grazia Cicenia and Others.

C-394/18 • 62018CJ0394 • ECLI:EU:C:2020:56

Inbound citations: 29
•
Cited paragraphs: 13
•
Outbound citations: 51

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Gm unique documents citing • GE citations total to VG paragraphs

Outbound citations

Mw unique documents cited • lI citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846