Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 710/2000 of 3 April 2000 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
CASE OF KRAYEVA v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES O’LEARY AND MOUROU-VIKSTRÖM
Commission Directive 2004/62/EC of 26 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include mepanipyrim as active substance (Text with EEA relevance)
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1301/88 of 11 May 1988 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
CASE OF LIGERES v. LATVIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1125/2010 of 3 December 2010 determining the intervention centres for cereals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1173/2009
CASE OF H. v. BELGIUMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
Regulation (EEC) No 19/74 of the Commission of 3 January 1974 fixing the export refunds on rice and broken rice
CASE OF SCOTT v. SPAINPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE REPIK
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 6 December 2012. Johann Odar v Baxter Deutschland GmbH.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2010. Dita Danosa v LKB Līzings SIA.

C-232/09 • 62009CJ0232 • ECLI:EU:C:2010:674

Inbound citations: 69
•
Cited paragraphs: 27
•
Outbound citations: 72

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

5G unique documents citing • 7j citations total to EE paragraphs

Outbound citations

Q7 unique documents cited • Ch citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846