Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŽÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLICCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 184/2013 of 4 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020. G. M. A. v État belge.
CASE OF W.S. v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S CASADEVALL AND MIJOVIĆ
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 March 2007. Aktiebolaget NN v Skatteverket.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2012. Bavaria NV v European Commission.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 July 2014. European Commission v Hellenic Republic.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011. Baris Unal v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1648/95 of 6 July 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes
CASE OF KURBAN v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE koskelo

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 5 November 2002. Überseering BV v Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH (NCC).

C-208/00 • 62000CJ0208 • ECLI:EU:C:2002:632

Inbound citations: 37
•
Cited paragraphs: 15
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

n9 unique documents citing • fv citations total to cg paragraphs

Outbound citations

I unique documents cited • u citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846