Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF K.-H. W. v. GERMANYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PELLONPÄÄ, JOINED BY JUDGE ZUPANČIČ
CASE OF ÜNER v. THE NETHERLANDSJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES COSTA, ZUPANČIČ AND TÜRMEN
CASE OF ZIELINSKI AND PRADAL AND OTHER CASES AGAINST FRANCE
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 145/2013 of 19 February 2013 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe
CASE OF TOPORKOV v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
Regulation (EEC) No 1192/74 of the Council of 13 May 1974 on aid for dehydrated fodder
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 360/76 of 19 February 1976 amending for the sixth time Regulation (EEC) No 2005/70 on the classification of vine varieties
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2168/93 of 2 August 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1586/93 introducing a countervailing charge on apples originating in Argentina

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 20 September 1990. S. Z. Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.

C-192/89 • 61989CJ0192 • ECLI:EU:C:1990:322

Inbound citations: 96
•
Cited paragraphs: 20
•
Outbound citations: 106

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Hc unique documents citing • td citations total to 7f paragraphs

Outbound citations

n unique documents cited • Umu citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846