Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2888/78 of 7 December 1978 amending for the 10th time Regulation (EEC) No 2005/70 on the classification of vine varieties
CASE OF COMPANHIA AGRICOLA DA APARIÇA, SA v. PORTUGAL
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 48/90 of 9 January 1990 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclature
Regulation (EEC) No 2744/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the import and export system for products processed from cereals and from rice
CASE OF TELTRONIC-CATV v. POLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BAKA, GARLICKI AND POPOVIĆ
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 1998. Hilmar Kulzer v Freistaat Bayern.
Regulation (EEC) No 379/71 of the Commission of 19 February 1971 laying down common quality standards for citrus fruit
CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY (ARTICLE 50)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE mifsud bonnici
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 January 2008. Lammers & Van Cleeff NV v Belgische Staat.
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 June 2013. Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2006. Amy Rockler v Försäkringskassan.

C-137/04 • 62004CJ0137 • ECLI:EU:C:2006:106

Inbound citations: 26
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 10

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

0O unique documents citing • KU citations total to E paragraphs

Outbound citations

TV unique documents cited • m2 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846