Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF N.Š. v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES KOSKELO AND EICKE
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 18 October 2012. Mednis SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.
FETAOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 September 2011. European Commission v Slovak Republic.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1241/86 of 28 April 1986 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
KUDUMIJA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND SERBIA and 2 other applications
CASE OF ŞIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 September 1997. Bernd von Hoffmann v Finanzamt Trier.
Commission Directive 2004/47/EC of 16 April 2004 amending Directive 95/45/EC as regards mixed carotenes (E 160 a (i)) and beta-carotene (E 160 a (ii)) (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2022 (Extracts). Republic of Austria v European Commission.

• 62018TJ0101 • ECLI:EU:T:2022:728

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 23

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

C0 unique documents cited • 0w citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846